You are currently browsing the tag archive for the 'marketing' tag.
When you find a fabulous and valuable gem - you want to wear it and show it off. Some believe the more you see of the gem the better. The setting you chose makes all the difference.
We believe communication is like a rare gem. The way you communicate and market to your consumers is like the setting you choose for your gem.
A closed setting is the oldest and most secure, with the gem completely enclosed in metal
In an invisible setting, the mount disappears from view to reveal the gem in all its lustre.
The closed setting is like the old school of approaching a consumer. It’s a more secure way of getting your message out. You ensure your own needs are met, but sometimes at the cost of your consumer.
The invisible setting is more like the way we use new marketing. The power shifts from seller to buyer, and more of the communication process is on show. The consumer is empowered to meet their own needs.
We’ll explore this setting metaphor further, but let’s apply it to a real-life situation.
On a Tuesday in March, in an office in Sydney, two people met to fix a problem. An internal business customer (BC) and an account executive (AE) met to discuss why business between them had come to a standstill.
The impasse had occurred because the business customer (BC) had decided to stop paying bills associated with their project until the delivery of service to their project, which was overseen by the account executive (AE) markedly improved.
The conversation went something like this -
AE: I want to discuss the problem we’re having with (..) so we can move ahead with the payment of the bills.
BC: We’ve already discussed the problem. And we can only move ahead if you stop charging my budget for your mistakes and for work I didn’t receive. I told you that before.
AE: I think you’re over-reacting. I want you to be happy. How can I make you happy?
BC: Let me be very clear. You called this meeting so I expect you to explain a solution. I will not sit here to hear you repeat things you’ve already told me..
AE: We need to get on. I’ve noticed you get angry very easily these days. The reason for the delay in (…) is because of (…).
BC: You see, that is something you have already told me. Until you actually fix the problem I see no reason to be talking.
The meeting ends.
This is a shortened version of the meeting. But we stop it here to have a look at what is happening.
AE attempted to assuage the other without directly addressing the problem(s) and the reason for the meeting. AE’s language is seasoned with personal judgements and emotional language. AE needs to maintain a status quo of control in the relationship. They need to have good relations and are comfortable with processes that have worked in the past and are likely to spin their version of the situation.
BC only hears repetition obfuscation, delay tactics and defence. BC wants a solution to the problem(s) identified. They are not interested in relationships. They are prepared to stop all dialogue to get the point across. BC is comfortable with the impasse until they are heard. To make their point, BC stopped payment of bills, because he knew this would cause the pain required to get the attention of AE.
These two approaches are very different. Collision is inevitable. It’s interesting to us because they epitomise increasingly divergent ways of marketing and communicating.
AE represents the closed setting. This approach is one favoured by someone communicating or
marketing from a position of power. The power is the traditional type characterising market dominance and market monopoly. AE is happy with his one-size-fit’s all approach to service delivery with minor tweaks. AE is not happy having to service each customers’ needs individually.
Those in the closed setting rely on processes, low accountability and loyalty to a consistent brand. They value the power base over the product and/or the customer. This is old school of marketing - advertising on television or print or radio. The strategy is geared to a broad, faceless market base. The customer isn’t heard or seen. It’s a numbers game about moving large numbers of average products to average people; the broad brush is aimed at a large market segment.
BC represents the invisible setting. This approach is characterised by limitless choice and customisation. This is more like the marketing global environment created by the world-wide-web. Consumers in this invisible setting are overtly disloyal to brands that don’t deliver to their specific needs. The consumer places a higher value on accountability and relevance. Variation and differentiation in products that meet highly specific needs is the new game.
The invisible setting is expansive and full of discovery. Consumers in the pursuit of need get online,
discuss online, dig and blog their preferences, influencing others to their way of thinking. This is the influencer network that is based on a single repeatable user experience. If they don’t find what they need with one product they’ll pursue another. Those who use the invisible setting have grown to expect choice and variation. They are used to shopping around in a global market of nearly unlimited options.
What does this mean for us as communicators? Well, the power you once held may now not be relevant. Your average product may not hold up in the new online global economy.
To get the setting you want we suggest you consider these elements of design.
- Truth telling is the nature of the game. You are going to be held accountable in this new searchable environment.
- Customisation will make your market bigger overall
- The nature of the exchange is all. The points of differentiation about how you deliver will matter. What the interaction is like and what it “feels” like doing business with you will be an integral part of your brand.
- The methods of advertisement have changed. Today the micro-niche and intimate is relevant. Your product is more often selected from personal encounters.
- Influencer networks means marketing has become a democracy. Single voices become choruses. “I dig what you digg, and all those that digg me will dig you”.



